
But facing a major challenge from upstart Republican rival Rick Santorum, he has chosen to outline such an overhaul in Arizona ahead of critical Feb. 28 primaries there and in Michigan — and before a televised debate Wednesday night in Mesa.
Romney’s top economic adviser, Glenn Hubbard, said the plan would cut all six current tax brackets — 10, 15, 25, 28, 33, and 35 percent, depending on a taxpayer’s income — by the same proportion of 20 percent. That would produce this new set of tax brackets: 8, 12, 20, 22.4, 26.4, and 28 percent."We want middle-income Americans to be the place we focus our help, because it's middle-income Americans that have been hurt by this Obama economy," Romney said in annoucning the plan. Hubbard said Romney is committed to making his plan both “revenue neutral” – meaning it won’t add to the budget deficit — and “distributionally neutral” – meaning that it won’t shift the tax burden from upper-income Americans to middle and working class Americans. Since the largest benefits from rate reduction would go to upper income taxpayers, so will the burdens of “base broadening” reductions in existing deductions needed to keep the government from hemorrhaging revenue, he explained. Reducing large tax deductions, such as the ones for home mortgage interest and state and local taxes, is politically treacherous because of their popularity with voters and elected officials alike. For now, at least, Romney will dodge any potential backlash by avoiding any specifics. Romney will pledge to work with Congress on “limiting them,” Hubbard said, but “it is not his intention to take on any specific deduction or exclusion and eliminate it.” Romney has praised the work of President Barack Obama’s Simpson-Bowles deficit reduction commission, and criticized the Democratic incumbent for ignoring its work. But Romney is also rejecting the commission's recommendation that tax overhaul produce increased government revenue to cut the deficit, while embracing its recommendation to cut the top tax rate to 29 percent or lower. Hubbard contrasted Romney’s “pro-growth” plan with Obama’s proposal to raise taxes on individuals earning more than $200,000 and households earning more than $250,000. He argued that would hurt economic growth by crimping small businesses, many of which file under the individual tax code. Hubbard, who advised former President George W. Bush and now is dean of the business school at Columbia University, also cast the Romney plan as superior to Santorum's.The former Pennsylvania senator would also cut the top individual rate to 28 percent, the level it reached after Congress and the White House agreed on a tax overhaul plan during Ronald Reagan’s presidency, which preserving only one more tax bracket of 10 percent. In the name of “national security,” Santorum has also proposed a zero tax rate for manufacturing businesses as a means of preserving and expanding that economic sector.
The Santorum plan would dramatically expand the budget deficit, Hubbard said, and the zero rate for manufacturing would result in “significant capital misallocation.” “Net-net, it’s a job destroyer, not a job creator,” Hubbard said.
![[cnbc explains]](/CNBCexplainsicon1.gif)
Hubbard, accusing the administration of a “full-throttle attack on multinationals," said Romney will propose shifting to a territorial system that would not tax corporate income earned overseas.
No comments:
Post a Comment